home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:49070 alt.abortion.inequity:5251
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!gumby!yale!cs.yale.edu!rtnmr.chem.yale.edu!rescorla
- From: rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla)
- Subject: Re: Male Choice Revi (1)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.001904.27701@cs.yale.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.yale.edu (Usenet News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
- Organization: Rescorla for himself.
- References: <By0uut.F7@cs.psu.edu> <1992Nov21.015024.17310@cs.yale.edu> <1992Nov21.194234.14911@rotag.mi.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 00:19:04 GMT
- Lines: 44
-
- In article <1992Nov21.194234.14911@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov21.015024.17310@cs.yale.edu> rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
- >>In article <By0uut.F7@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >>>In article <1992Nov20.011111.3228@cs.yale.edu> rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla) writes:
- >>>>In article <BxzGIs.KtH@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >>>>>In article <1e8urpINNkjl@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
- >>>>>>Yah know, Will, you may believe this, but I don't. We've just seen Steve
- >>>>>>Kellmeyer and Don Beaver come out of the closet on this issue: they don't
- >>>>>>want women to have the right to abort. THAT's what they are after, and too
- >>>>>>hell with the reason you mention, above.
- >>>>>Short and sweet: Adrienne, you are a liar.
- >>>>>No flame intended. Just fact.
- >>>>In what way is Adrienne a liar, Don? Can you support this?
- >>>I posted Adrienne's paragraph (above) for that reason.
- >>>Adrienne made an explicit claim about me that is untrue.
- >>>That's something I call a lie.
- >>It's not what I call a lie. I'm prepared to grant that it is not descriptive
- >>of you, but you need to show that she knew it to be untrue for it
- >>to be a lie.
- >Are you saying that all lies must be deliberate, Eric? You have a narrower
- >definition than I do -- I'd count something as a non-deliberate lie if it
- >evidenced a reckless disregard for the truth.
- Yes, well I would suggest that we have different standards, then.
-
-
- >Even if we disregard Don's views for a moment here,
- >it's a well-known fact that Kellmeyer doesn't support any child support
- >reforms.
- I agree.
-
- >Surely Adrienne remembers all of his alarmist crap about people
- >wanting to "weaken" child support? Does that sound progressive? Does he sound
- >like a reformer to you?
- Too much of this thread is gone for me to track exactly what you're
- referring to. What do you think Adrienne said about Kellmeyer that
- shows a reckless disregard for truth?
- -Ekr
-
-
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Eric Rescorla, DoD#431 (Nighthawk S) rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
- Former chemist now CM400 mechanic ekr@eitech.com(preferred)
- "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."
-