home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: Jim, the chastity belt theory, and me, Part 1
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.190518.20522@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1992Nov20.135322.8688@panix.com> <1ejhs2INNldl@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> <1992Nov21.165104.10764@panix.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 19:05:18 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Nov21.165104.10764@panix.com> jk@panix.com (Jim Kalb) writes:
-
- }And what should people do if their principles differ and lead them
- }into conflict? It seems to me the outcome is the war of all against
- }all unless they can find some principles to agree on.
-
- It only takes one side to say "we won't kill" to pretty much not
- have a "war" as we know it. That is a principle they need not
- agree on that doesn't lead to war, it can (and probably will) be
- in conflict with the other side. It doesn't matter what other
- principles conflict.
-
- Sorry to preach, but he started it. He mentioned "war."
-
-
- --
- hang gliding mailing list: hang-gliding-request@virginia.edu
- Galen Hekhuis UVa Health Sci Ctr (804)982-1646 gjh@virginia.edu
- We are the Cro-Magnon of the future!
-