home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!cookc
- From: cookc@marcus.its.rpi.edu (rocker)
- Subject: Re: Yet more unsubstantiated stuff from Nyikos
- Message-ID: <3x113cn@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: marcus.its.rpi.edu
- References: <1992Nov17.204839.28250@acd4.acd.com>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 10:41:07 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- wdo@TEFS1.acd.com (Bill Overpeck) writes:
-
- >Unnecessary, though it exists. Before going into private practice,
- >one of the psychologists I work with was the director of the Addic-
- >tions Services division of our local mental health center. He has
- >a fairly impressive library of relevant reference material which I
- >was browsing through last night. But I see no value in posting any
- >of it. Inevitably, the controls would be deemed inadequate or the
- >conclusions misinterpreted. The only solid research would likely
- >consist of those studies (if one could find them) that support your
- >personal agenda. But since nothing that I read seemed to do that,
- >they're all undoubtedly flawed.
-
- Usenet Avoidance Tactic #357: I _could_ post facts to back up my
- position, but you wouldn't believe them anyway so why should I bother?
-
- -rocker
-