home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 48955 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-20  |  1.5 KB  |  37 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsi!cbnewsh!att-out!cbnewsj!decay
  3. From: decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz)
  4. Subject: Re: Larry Margolis contacts my sysadmin
  5. Organization: AT&T
  6. Distribution: na
  7. Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 04:00:41 GMT
  8. Message-ID: <1992Nov21.040041.21953@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
  9. Summary: Threats and backpedals
  10. References: <1992Nov20.185956.9174@ncsu.edu> <dd11skh@rpi.edu> <1992Nov21.022031.24146@ncsu.edu>
  11. Lines: 24
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Nov21.022031.24146@ncsu.edu>, dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
  14. > I provided the proof that Larry Margolis contacted my
  15. > sysadmins.  I'm not surprised that you're unwilling to
  16. > accept it.
  17.  
  18. You claimed he sent"threatening email" to your system
  19. administrator.  I read your posting.  There was no threat.
  20. There was imply a statement that you had cross-posted widely
  21. and inappropriately and that you should receive a "talking
  22. to."  Nothing about removing net access.  Nothing about sending
  23. you to bed without your supper.  Nothing about calling your church
  24. elders and telling the Synod about your misbehavior.  In
  25. fact, you weren't even identified by name.
  26.  
  27. Now you have toned down your accusation to state that Larry
  28. contacted your system administrator.  But the disputed statement
  29. was that he sent "threatening email."  To say that someone
  30. threatened you is a harsh statement.  Since the email was not
  31. threatening, you certainly do owe an apology for your
  32. misrepresentation.
  33.  
  34. Dean Kaflowitz
  35.  
  36.  
  37.