home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: Late-term abortion
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.181253.11062@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <1992Nov9.174836.9036@netcom.com> <1992Nov9.190651.26177@ncsu.edu> <lefty-161192125641@lefty.apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:12:53 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <lefty-161192125641@lefty.apple.com> lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov9.190651.26177@ncsu.edu>, dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu
- >(Doug Holtsinger) wrote:
- >>
- >> In article <1992Nov9.174836.9036@netcom.com>
- >> ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
- >> >dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes ...
- >> >>kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) asks rocker:
- >>
- >> >>> How many viable lives would have to be terminated without good cause
- >> >>> before you'd permit preventitive legislation restricting late-term
- >> >>> abortions?
- >>
- >> >> I've seen very few pro-choicers answer this question.
- >
- >I've seen no definition of "good cause", nor any statement of who would be
- >making the determination of whether a particular "cause" is "good", or how
- >that determination might be made.
-
- Use whatever yardstick you want, unless you claim that there is no such
- thing as a "bad" reason to abortion a late-term fetus.
-
- >Until I see a better set of definitions here, I would support no
- >restrictions on a woman's right to decide to end her own pregnancy.
-
- Same here. But, the next question on the survey is: would you oppose ALL such
- legal restrictions?
-
- - Kevin
-