home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!bskendig
- From: bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig)
- Subject: Re: The answer (are the unborn alive?)!!!
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.142614.7402@netcom.com>
- Organization: Starfleet Headquarters: San Francisco
- References: <1eb4hgINNr1@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> <1992Nov18.095021.10085@netcom.com> <1eg014INN6aq@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 14:26:14 GMT
- Lines: 76
-
- frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer) writes:
- >bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig) writes:
- >#
- >#Easy. Find something which is commonly considered as having a soul
- >#(you, for example), and find something which is commonly considered as
- >#not having a soul (a cat, for example). Note the differences between
- >
- >...
- >What I am saying is "commonly considered" doesn't really work for me, sorry.
- >
- >Does a cat have a soul? Haven't a clue. I don't go out of my way to harm
- >cats.
-
- If "commonly considered" doesn't fly for you, then how can we say
- anything at all about souls? There's no way to empirically verify
- that a fetus does or does not have a soul -- in fact, I don't believe
- there is any such thing as a 'soul'. I was merely referring to what I
- think the most common idea of a "soul" is, in the Christian sense.
- I'd have to say that this Catholic who told you that animals have
- messiahs definitely holds a minority opinion (he sounds loony, but hey).
-
- Sure, you don't go out of your way to harm cats, but what relevance
- does that have? Do you go out of your way to hurt rocks?
-
- >#you and the cat that lead people to believe that you have a soul while
- >#the cat doesn't: the ability to conceive of indirect solutions to
- >#problems, the ability to use language, and so forth.
- >
- >These are measures of intelligence, not humanity. There are lots of people
- >who can't do either of the things you mention to any useful degree, and some
- >of them are my colleagues :-)
-
- I disagree. I've never heard of anyone whom I would call a 'person'
- who wasn't capable of either of these two things.
-
- >#Now compare anything against the two of you. A minority person would
- >#possess many, if not all, of the distinctions that distinguish you
- >#from the cat.
- >
- >Only because YOU say so. Only because you want it to turn out that way,
- >perhaps.
-
- *blink*
-
- Can you provide some believable objective criteria that would indicate
- that a black man is more similar to a cat than to a white man?
-
- >#A fetus, on the other hand, would not, nor would it
- >#even biologically be similar to either you nor the cat until late in
- >#its development (that's biologically, note, not genetically).
- >
- >Sure. We can invent criteria which allow us to treat a foetus as less than
- >fully human. Some of these criteria are even extremely reasonable ones.
- >Nevertheless, some the actions which they are used to justify stink to
- >high heaven. That's the data of immediate experience, and I'm willing to
- >fly with that.
-
- I'm not treating it as 'less than fully human'. I'm just recognizing
- that humanity's not the important thing. What are these actions that
- you feel I'm using my opinions to justify, and why are they bad?
-
- >I believe there's a certain amount of reverse engineering going on here. We
- >can do this for just about any helpless minority, and have done, in living
- >memory.
-
- I'm honestly not at all sure where you're coming from. Why aren't you
- also defending animals from being butchered for food? They're
- certainly helpless, and you've admitted they might have souls, and we
- can certainly live with fewer steaks in our lives.
-
- --
- _/_/_/ Brian Kendig Je ne suis fait comme aucun
- /_/_/ bskendig@netcom.com de ceux que j'ai vus; j'ose croire
- _/_/ n'etre fait comme aucun de ceux qui existent.
- / Nolite te bastardes Si je ne vaux pas mieux, au moins je suis autre.
- / carborundorum. -- Rousseau
-