home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sgiblab!wetware!diana
- From: diana@wetware.com (CatWoman )
- Subject: Re: Why Pro-Lifers must support forced organ donation
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.135428.29187@wetware.com>
- Sender: news@wetware.com (Usenet News Account)
- Organization: Castle WetWare MouseCatcher
- References: <1992Nov17.221040.6631@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1efh9gINNcg9@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> <1992Nov20.002427.8280@wdl.loral.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 13:54:28 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- bard@cutter.ssd.loral.com writes:
-
- ] frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer) writes:
- ] # It's pretty clear to all of us, I think, that cancer is always unwelcome, and
- ] # pregnancy isn't. I don't imagine women will voluntarily place cancer cells
- ] # in their womb anytime soon, and I don't believe you do either.
- ]
- ] I have several benign cancers I am in no hurry to have removed.
-
- And, given that along with all the OTHER wonderful
- changes my body goes through once a month, I get a
- 24-48 hour bout with cramps bad enough to disrupt
- my sleep, and work, and generally make it impossible
- to function the first 2 days of menses, I have MANY
- times longed for my PAP smear to come back showing
- cancer cells - so I could HAVE a hysterectomy and
- STOP the cramping and bleeding.
-
- Diana
-
- p.s.: not to mention that if I had to have the
- full ovario-hysterectomy the PYM would probably be
- ecstatic - I wouldn't always want *SEX!* - it
- says here in VERY small print...
-