home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uvaarpa!murdoch!galen.med.Virginia.EDU!gjh
- From: gjh@galen.med.Virginia.EDU (Galen J. Hekhuis)
- Subject: Re: In defense of Peter against "Lady" Adrienne
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.020939.21818@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Sender: usenet@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
- Organization: University of Virginia Health Sciences Center
- References: <1992Nov4.182400.14587@acd4.acd.com> <nyikos.721587670@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1992Nov20.003506.8807@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 02:09:39 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Nov20.003506.8807@ncsu.edu> dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)writes:
-
- }I don't consider myself to be "pro-choice" because I'm personally
- }undecided on the issue of legislation.
-
- Unfortunately, especially in areas regarding legislation, you usually
- don't get to vote "undecided." Perhaps that should be a choice.
- Until then, however, you get to cast your vote for it or against
- it, or for someone who will for you. Unless you don't vote, and
- that's a whole different subject.
-
- I would rather vote for a candidate who refused to make it an issue,
- and who would refuse to consider it a fit subject for legislation.
-
- --
- hang gliding mailing list: hang-gliding-request@virginia.edu
- Galen Hekhuis UVa Health Sci Ctr (804)982-1646 gjh@virginia.edu
- We are the Cro-Magnon of the future!
-