home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:48599 talk.religion.misc:21540 alt.atheism:21660
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,talk.religion.misc,alt.atheism
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!wupost!gumby!yale!cs.yale.edu!rtnmr.chem.yale.edu!rescorla
- From: rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla)
- Subject: Re: Reconciling OT with NT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.212031.1576@cs.yale.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.yale.edu (Usenet News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
- Organization: Rescorla for himself.
- References: <1992Nov17.035838.10565@sol.ctr.columbia.edu> <1992Nov19.210645.6256@noao.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:20:31 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Nov19.210645.6256@noao.edu> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
- >From article by locklin@titan.ucc.umass.edu (Misquamicus):
- >> In article jsm@ibis.dsto.gov.au (James Marcus) writes:
- >>
- >> Then we get to the question of his alleged direct decent from king David.
- >> Ever notice in Matthew it traces Jesus ancestry through JOSEPH to David?
- >And in the Gospel of Luke, his ancestry his traced through MARY to David.
- >So there you have it. A direct bloodline.
- Pure harmonization. There is nothing internal to the text that suggests
- this.
-
- >> Ever notice the contradictions in the geneologies given in the other gospels?
- >Heh? Just because one's paternal and one's maternal does not mean they
- >contradict.
- What makes you think that the one in Luke is maternal?
- -Ekr
-
-
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Eric Rescorla, DoD#431 (Nighthawk S) rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
- Former chemist now CM400 mechanic ekr@eitech.com(preferred)
- "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."
-