home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 48370 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-17  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sun-barr!rutgers!cmcl2!panix!jk
  2. From: jk@panix.com (Jim Kalb)
  3. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  4. Subject: Re: Jim, the chastity belt theory, and me, Part 5
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov17.221107.23870@panix.com>
  6. Date: 17 Nov 92 22:11:07 GMT
  7. References: <32728@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <32735@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <1992Nov17.064218.17638@panix.com> <32781@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU>
  8. Organization: Institute for the Human Sciences
  9. Lines: 13
  10.  
  11. In <32781@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> smezias@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU (Stephen J. Mezias) writes:
  12.  
  13. >A drunk driver is not forced to donate tissue, blood, or organs to
  14. >save the life of a victim of his bad judgment.
  15.  
  16. If the drunk driver were the only possible source of those things, the
  17. victim would certainly die if the donation weren't made, and the
  18. burden to the drunk driver would b commensurate with the burden to a
  19. woman of carrying a pregnancy to term, would you say it would be in
  20. principle unjust to force him to make the donation?  If so, why?
  21. -- 
  22. Jim Kalb (jk@panix.com)
  23. "He who desires but acts not, breeds pestilence."  (Blake)
  24.