home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!keegan
- From: keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.)
- Subject: Re: restrictions
- Message-ID: <wgx1q3j@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hermes.acm.rpi.edu
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- References: <1992Nov17.004440.19764@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <1992Nov17.055146.5262@netcom.com> <1992Nov17.162948.18306@nas.nasa.gov> <1992Nov17.215532.7928@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 01:31:29 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- eeb1@quads.uchicago.edu (e elizabeth bartley) writes:
- ->dking@raul.nas.nasa.gov (Dan King) writes:
- ->>ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes:
- ->>>Isn't there some way of protecting viable fetuses while ensuring the
- ->>>right of a woman to end the pregnancy?
-
- ->>No there is not. At least not legislative.
-
- ->Truth by Blatant Assertion.
-
- i'm afraid posting cute, trite and inaccurate
- statements doesn't make them so, ms. bartley. it
- appears you're demonstrating truth by blatant assertion
- rather than applying it to dan's comment.
-
-