home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!nigel.msen.com!heifetz!rotag!kevin
- From: kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy)
- Subject: Re: Jim reiterates the chastity belt theory of forced pregnancy!
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.165420.294@rotag.mi.org>
- Organization: Who, me???
- References: <32682@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> <1992Nov15.190305.26198@panix.com> <1e90b9INNlbk@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 16:54:20 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1e90b9INNlbk@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov15.190305.26198@panix.com> jk@panix.com (Jim Kalb) writes:
- >.In <32682@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU> smezias@rnd.GBA.NYU.EDU (Stephen J. Mezias) writes:
- >.
- >.>So, to accept your argument we have to buy all
- >.>of the assumptions implicit in equating child support payments and
- >.>forced pregnancy.
- >>
- >>My claim was only that child support payments are a heavy obligation
- >>that can seriously affect the ability of the person burdened by the
- >>obligation to live his life as he wants to. There are obvious
- >>differences between making such payments and being pregnant. The
- >
- >You bet your life there are. In the first place, the woman in question
- >has two responsibilities, and the man in question only one.
-
- Two voluntary responsibilities, yes. Which doesn't even hold a candle
- to one FORCED responsibility, in terms of injustice.
-
- Yet again, Adrienne, you are guilty of making the consent of the woman
- to her situation "invisible".
-
- - Kevin
-