home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!emory!gatech!hubcap!opusc!usceast!nyikos
- From: nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos)
- Subject: Re: compromise
- Message-ID: <nyikos.721974650@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- Keywords: Holtsinger refuted
- Sender: usenet@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: USC Department of Computer Science
- References: <1992Nov5.195956.27302@ncsu.edu> <Bx9n9K.Mu2.2@cs.cmu.edu> <nyikos.721692137@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1992Nov14.142652.29494@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: 17 Nov 92 04:30:50 GMT
- Lines: 68
-
- In <1992Nov14.142652.29494@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
-
- >In article <nyikos.721692137@milo.math.scarolina.edu>, nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes:
- >>
- >> Typical. She makes allegations of the unreliability of the quote, does
- >> not give her own quote, deletes Doug's quote. I move that networkers
- >> disregard such claims as "he had made unmarked deletions" by Ms. Garvin
- >> until she shows where these were made and what they were [or at least
- >> a sample].
-
- >Considering your inability to figure out who said what in
- >a posting, your comments on anyone else's deletions or posting
- >behavior is highly suspect to say the least. In fact, given
- >your history, there is a presumption that what you say about
- >anyone's quotes or deletions is incorrect.
-
- Show me where I was unable to figure out who said what.
-
- You seem to believe what others say about me instead of thinking for
- yourself.
-
- >Oh, and can you please explain why you think Susan shouldn't
- >b eallowed to delete material from a posting? She explains her
- >reasons for the deletions and it is a reasonable explanation
- >and the deletions are practical.
-
- I won't argue with that, I'm just suspending judgment about the truth
- of her allegations until she posts documentation. You would do well
- to do the same the next time you accuse me of something.
-
- >I think Dr Giggles is back doing his "I'll just attack
- >my opponents for no good reason" game again. He made an ass
- >of himself with Adrienne and now he has an urge to make an
- >ass of himself with Susan.
-
- You have not seen all the evidence in re the Adrienne game. You don't
- even realize that she started the attack, not I. I wonder whether you
- can take off your ideological blinders long enough to disbelieve
- *anything* Adrienne says about me.
-
- >I suspect that Nyikos isn't really teaching mathematics. I
- >think he's the NCSU Professor of Making an Ass of One's Self.
- >In that regard, he holds th epost with great distinction.
-
- Go on, Dean, make an ass of yourself, see if I care.
-
- >> As far as I can see, this unsupported allegation ["you cannot assume..."]
- >> by Ms. Garvin is her sole support for her word "*completely*" highlighted
- >> above.
-
- >Oh, and there is much more support for it than that. The fact
- >that actual practice supports Susan's statement is pretty good
- >support. As always, Peter, you prefer wild speculations such
- >as Doug's, to the facts.
-
- Funny how you deleted Chief Justice Burger's words from my post.
- Would you characterize his lambasting of the actual practice of Roe v. Wade
- with the "mere shallow rhetoric" of Blackmun as "wild speculation"?
-
- >Dean Kaflowitz
-
- The day you are an actual Dean of anything will be the day college
- students are done a serious disservice.
-
- Peter Nyikos
-
-
-
-