home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / sci / skeptic / 19748 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-17  |  951 b   |  20 lines
  1. Newsgroups: sci.skeptic
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!yoyo.aarnet.edu.au!news.adelaide.edu.au!augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU!dabbott
  3. From: dabbott@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU (Derek Abbott)
  4. Subject: Re: Biblical Inerrancy?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov18.021504.13692@augean.eleceng.adelaide.edu.AU>
  6. Organization: Electrical and Electronic Eng., University of Adelaide
  7. References: <GERRY.92Nov11131033@onion.cmu.edu> <28064@castle.ed.ac.uk>
  8. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 02:15:04 GMT
  9. Lines: 9
  10.  
  11. In article <28064@castle.ed.ac.uk> gtclark@festival.ed.ac.uk (G T Clark) writes:
  12. >
  13. >       The bible is patently not inerrant.Read Leviticus,chapter 18(or
  14. >thereabouts) where it fairly clearly states that insects walk "upon all
  15. >fours... fourfootedly upon the ground".That's quite clearly a mistake,
  16. >no matter what stage it crept in at.
  17. >
  18.  
  19. It also says that pi=3.
  20.