home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!daffy!uwvax!meteor!tobis
- From: tobis@meteor.wisc.edu (Michael Tobis)
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA. Att: PRATT FUND. THM. OF ALGEBRA
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.190744.6915@meteor.wisc.edu>
- Keywords: CORRECTION FUNDAMENTAL THM. OF ALGEBRA
- Organization: University of Wisconsin, Meteorology and Space Science
- References: <1992Nov18.175601.18259@prl.philips.nl> <1992Nov19.074930.15845@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> <1992Nov20.100104.17600@prl.philips.nl>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 92 19:07:44 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- Paulo da Costa writes:
- >No. He got his "contradiction" by making an invalid expansion. If you
- >really try to do the "long division" the way he did you'll see that the
- >remainder after each step contains steadily growing NEGATIVE powers of
- >z, so the expansion is not valid in the vicinity of z=0, where he
- >proceeded to use it (the expansion converges for z *outside* a radius
- >of convergence that includes all zeros of his polynomial -- to prove
- >that it converges _anywhere_, he first has to arrive at his
- >contradiction...).
-
- I note that Abian has not reposted the analysis taht originally caught
- my attention, where the fallacy is equally egregious but much more obvious.
-
- As I recall, he obtained an expression (1 + z + z^2) and "proved" it equal
- to zero by synthetic division yielding two "different" results. The obvious
- problem with this approach is that it results in 1 + z + z^2 = 0 FOR ALL Z.
- The flaw is similar to the one you point out, i.e., one of the series is
- divergent. But the result is so ludicrous as to be obviously false at an
- extremely elementary level.
-
- mt
-
-