home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!pavo.csi.cam.ac.uk!emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk!rgep
- From: rgep@emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk (Richard Pinch)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Help with Algebraic Number Theory
- Keywords: hilbert algebraic number
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.115400.12284@infodev.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 11:54:00 GMT
- References: <1epji1INN66u@manuel.anu.edu.au>
- Sender: news@infodev.cam.ac.uk (USENET news)
- Organization: Department of Pure Mathematics, University of Cambridge
- Lines: 55
- Nntp-Posting-Host: emu.pmms.cam.ac.uk
-
- In article <1epji1INN66u@manuel.anu.edu.au> molrchon@mehta.anu.edu.au writes:
- >
- >My thesis topic is "Hilbert's 10th Problem and a Generalization to
- >Algebraic Integers". In the course of the year, one of the papers I read
- >was:
- >
- > Denef & Lipshitz, "Diophantine Sets Over Some Rings of Algebraic Integers",
- > J. London Math. Soc., v18, 1978, pp385-391.
- >
- >and I am covering the contents of that paper in my thesis. One of the theorems
- >proved in that paper is the following:
- >
- >Notation: For a number field L (ie. a field of algebraic numbers, of finite
- > degree over the rationals) the ring of algebraic integers in L will be
- > denoted O(L). The multiplicative group of units in O(L) will be denoted U_L.
- > The torsion free rank of a group G will be denoted rk G.
- >
- >THEOREM:
- > Let L be any number field and d \in O(L) such that sqrt(d) \not\in L.
- > Write L' = L(sqrt(d)). Define
- >
- > V_L = {x + y.sqrt(d) : x,y \in O(L) and x^2 - dy^2 = 1}
- >
- > Then V_L is a subgroup of U_{L'} and
- >
- > rk V_L = rk U_{L'} - rk U_L
- >ENDTHEOREM
- >
- >The proof suggested by Denef & Lipshitz starts as follows:
- >
- > Let N:U_{L'} -> U_L be the restriction of the norm from L' to L. In this case
- > we have N(u + v.sqrt(d)) = u^2 - dv^2, so that V_L is a subgroup of
- > kernel(N). The claim is that V_L in fact has finite index in kernel(N).
- > Denef & Lipshitz do not explicitly prove this, but say it follows easily from
- > the following lemma:
- >
- > Suppose K is a number field, e \in U_K and 0 != t \in O(K). Then there is
- > m > 0 such that t | e^m - e^{-m}.
- >
- > My supervisor and I have been unable to see quite how this implies what we need.
- >
- We need to show that if u \in U_{L'} is annihiliated by the
- norm map N then some power of u, say u^m, is in V_L. Now u = x + y sqrt(d)
- with x, y \in L, and N(u) = x^2 - dy^2 = 1, so the only question
- is about the integrality of x and y. By the lemma cited, there is an m
- such that u^m + u^{-m} is divisible by 2sqrt(d).
- Let u^m = X + Y sqrt(d). Now u^m and u^{-m} are algebraic integers,
- so u^m+u^{-m} = 2X is: but 2X is divisible by 2sqrt(d) and so in particular
- X is integral, and even divisible by sqrt(d). Now Y sqrt(d) = u^m - x is
- a difference of integers, each divisible by sqrt(d) and hence an integer
- divisible by sqrt(d). So X and Y are integers and so in O_L.
- The finiteness of the index follows from applying this argument to a
- set of generators u_i for U_L' and then taking the lcm of the resulting m_i.
-
- Richard Pinch
-