home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!darkstar.UCSC.EDU!darkstar!steinly
- From: steinly@topaz.ucsc.edu (Steinn Sigurdsson)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Subject: Re: I=PAT, and a little sci-fi
- Date: 22 Nov 92 17:09:19
- Organization: Lick Observatory/UCO
- Lines: 39
- Message-ID: <STEINLY.92Nov22170919@topaz.ucsc.edu>
- References: <1466601925@igc.apc.org>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: topaz.ucsc.edu
- In-reply-to: alanm@igc.apc.org's message of 21 Nov 92 06:09:00 GMT
-
- In article <1466601925@igc.apc.org> alanm@igc.apc.org (Alan McGowen) writes:
-
- Some thoughts on ecosystem impacts and the I = PAT eqn. [I =
- impact, P = population size, A = mean "affluence" or consumption,
- T = impact of technology used to provide consumed goods or
- services.]
-
- The I = PAT idea is due to Ehrlich and Holdren [1].
-
- Some posters have criticised the idea on the grounds that the
- factors are not in general completely independent, i.e they say
- that we might have A = A(P,T), T = T(P,A) or dependencies on
- derivatives. It has also been suggested that only physical
-
- Also, the trivial case has a population density dependence
- which I think is an irreducible term - that's assuming that
- "I" is quantifiable (or A,T for that matter...) ;-)
-
- ...
-
- The moral: thou shalt not multiply implicit variables beyond
- empirical necessity without well-supported and *applicable*
- theoretical cause, or in other words Keep It Simple, Stupid.
-
- Associated moral, often forgotten: "if all you have is a toy
- model don't expect it to say anything about reality".
-
- * Steinn Sigurdsson Lick Observatory *
- * steinly@lick.ucsc.edu "standard disclaimer" *
- * Ain't you heard of the the starving millions? *
- * Ain't you heard of contraception? "Too much too young" Specials, 1979 *
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-