home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!DIALix!Gilsys!gil
- From: gil@Gilsys.DIALix.oz.au (Gil Hardwick)
- Newsgroups: sci.environment
- Subject: The Criterion for Ecocentrism
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <722401197snx@Gilsys.DIALix.oz.au>
- References: <1992Nov21.014807.24403@ke4zv.uucp>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 92 02:59:57 GMT
- Organization: STAFF STRATEGIES - Anthropologists & Training Agents
- Lines: 27
-
-
- In article <1992Nov21.014807.24403@ke4zv.uucp> gary@ke4zv.UUCP writes:
-
- > In a sense yes. See a previous post for a mechanism to deal with a
- > polluting incinerator. You can't tag a particular liter of air as
- > belonging to a particular person, but you can take free market action
- > to establish a economic price for a particular level of clean air in
- > a particular location. IE you can drive a pollutor out of business, or
- > force him to clean up his act, by subsidizing a cleaner competitor.
- >
- > People and organizations go to great lengths to get around disincentives,
- > and conversely they go to great lengths to gain incentives. The carrot
- > is almost always more powerful than the stick. There's a multi-billion
- > dollar industry in the US dedicated to tax avoidance. Dodging taxes is
- > considered honorable by many. On the other hand, offer to pay for a
- > service and people will flock to your door trying to get your business.
- > Pollution taxes go against the natural economic grain. It establishes
- > a free lunch system where those who benefit don't pay for the benefit
- > and those who suffer, do so disproportionately.
-
- Again, we agree.
-
- --
- Gil Hardwick gil@Gilsys.DIALix.oz.au
- Independent Consulting Ethnologist 3:690/660.6
- PERTH, Western Australia (+61 9) 399 2401
- * * Sustainable Community Development & Environmental Education * *
-