home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.energy
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!vincent2.iastate.edu!viking
- From: viking@iastate.edu (Dan Sorenson)
- Subject: Re: Greenpeace: Anti-US feelings
- Message-ID: <viking.722571813@vincent2.iastate.edu>
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
- References: <1652@airgun.wg.waii.com> <1992Nov21.083508.12081@netcom.com> <1857@spam.ua.oz> <1992Nov23.211252.486@michael.apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1992 02:23:33 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- ems@michael.apple.com (E. Michael Smith) writes:
-
- >Wars have been fought with a variety of odd munitions over
- >the years prior to WWI, some of which I would expect would count as
- >chemicals....
-
- >(What this has to do with energy is beyond me. Is there a rec.war?)
-
- There is a sci.military and an alt.war, neither of which are
- likely to want to talk about Greenpeace. I agree, it's time this
- portion of the thread get back on track with respect to energy.
-
- Just for thought, though, perhaps the first use of chemical
- weapons was that battle (Carthage, Troy, something like that) where the
- ground was sown with salt to prevent future plant growth.
-
- < Dan Sorenson, DoD #1066 z1dan@exnet.iastate.edu viking@iastate.edu >
- < ISU only censors what I read, not what I say. Don't blame them. >
- < "This isn't an answer, it's a pagan dance around a midnight fire >
- < written in intellectual runes." -- Rich Young >
-