home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!bo275
- From: bo275@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Larry R Beam)
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Subject: Re: A Supply Side Call to Arms
- Date: 18 Nov 1992 18:20:30 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (USA)
- Lines: 133
- Message-ID: <1ee1hfINN9n3@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slc4.ins.cwru.edu
-
-
- For the narrow consideration of immediate impact on income
-
- and employment, all government spending is equivalent. Indeed,
-
- all spending by all actors in the economy is exactly equivalent
-
- in this sense. All spending in the domestic economy, whether by
-
- consumers, investors, government, or foreigners, has identical
-
- impact on income and product, and so on employment. (Economists
-
- will recognize this fundamental identity of national income
-
- accounting: Y=C+I+G+(X-M).)
-
- This analysis is meaningful for the current time period
-
- only: in any longer analysis, real investment is quite
-
- different from other spending. That's because real investment
-
- is (by definition) an increase in society's productive
-
- capacity. Some government spending should be thought of as
-
- investment. The building (or repair) of infrastructure, and
-
- spending on education, are examples of government spending
-
- which tend to increase the society's productive capacity.
-
- In the categories of real investment and investment-like
-
- government spending, America has lagged badly in the
-
- Reagan-Bush years. Supply-side policies have resulted in the
-
- movement of huge amounts of resources into purely financial
-
- investments--just changes in the ownership of existing
-
- productive resources, as in leveraged buy-outs and other
-
- manipulations of paper. In real investment, the building of new
-
- productive capacity, America has lagged far behind most of the
-
- other industrialized democracies. Which is a large part of why
-
- our growth has been so anemic.
-
- Also hugely contributing to our slow growth has been how
-
- Reagan and Bush spent government resources. They pushed for
-
- spending largely on military build-up. They discouraged
-
- spending on infrastructure, education, health care, and
-
- research--all sorts of spending which would have contributed to
-
- the potential for future growth.
-
- On the same page of The General Theory on which JM Keynes
-
- tells the story (told in slightly distorted form by Mr. Howe in
-
- article 31664) of filling bottles with bank-notes, and burying
-
- them in disused coal mines, he writes that "Pyramid-building,
-
- earthquakes, and even wars may serve to increase wealth, if the
-
- education of our statesmen on the principles of classical
-
- economics stands in the way of anything better." [p. 129] Mr.
-
- Howe makes the mistake of reading Keynes' sarcasm as straight
-
- stuff. Keynes is clear, to the point of being tediously
-
- repetitive, in his preference for spending on such things as
-
- housing, hospitals, and roads.
-
- Discretionary government spending, with the explicit
-
- purpose of economic stimulation, can be exceedingly productive.
-
- Swiftly after the publication of Keynes' General Theory,
-
- deficit spending engaged in by the Roosevelt
-
- Administration--the WPA, especially--resulted in the
-
- construction of parks, dams, public buildings, and roads from
-
- which immense benefits continue to flow to the American people.
-
- No rational person can call it waste.
-
-
-
- ---Larry Beam.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-