home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.econ
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!jwh
- From: jwh@citi.umich.edu (Jim Howe)
- Subject: Re: A Supply Side Call to Arms
- Message-ID: <m2F=Rj+@engin.umich.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 92 09:53:57 EST
- Organization: IFS Project, University of Michigan
- References: <1992Nov14.172226.5605@desire.wright.edu> <1992Nov15.190249.11564@midway.uchicago.edu> <0#F=S+-@engin.umich.edu> <56352@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Reply-To: jwh@citi.umich.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: tarkus.citi.umich.edu
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <56352@dime.cs.umass.edu>, yodaiken@chelm.cs.umass.edu (victor yodaiken) writes:
- |> In article <0#F=S+-@engin.umich.edu> jwh@citi.umich.edu writes:
- |> >I don't know, spending under Bush rose 28%. Spending as a percentage
- |> >of GNP went from approx. 21% to over 25%. Shouldn't we be seeing
- |> >the wonders of Keynesian deficit spending? We've increased spending
- |> >and the economy has gone flat. Seems like there is more to getting
- |> >the economy going that spending more money.
- |> >
- |>
- |> What form of Keynsianism suggests that all government spending is
- |> equivalent?
-
- Perhaps the form originally espoused by Keynes himself? I believe
- that Keynes claimed that *any* spending by government would be
- beneficial. I think the example he gave concerned hiring workers
- to dig a hole to bury gold and then hiring people to dig it back
- up again.
-
-
- James W. Howe internet: jwh@citi.umich.edu
- University of Michigan uucp: uunet!mailrus!citi.umich.edu!jwh
- Ann Arbor, MI 48103-4943
-
-