home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.crypt:4844 sci.math:15015 comp.theory:2427
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt,sci.math,comp.theory
- Path: sparky!uunet!telebit!phr
- From: phr@telebit.com (Paul Rubin)
- Subject: Re: Cryptography and P=NP
- In-Reply-To: djimenez@ringer.cs.utsa.edu's message of Sun, 15 Nov 1992 11:09:45 GMT
- Message-ID: <PHR.92Nov15203840@napa.telebit.com>
- Sender: news@telebit.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: napa.telebit.com
- Organization: Telebit Corporation; Sunnyvale, CA, USA
- References: <1992Nov15.110945.19939@ringer.cs.utsa.edu>
- Date: 15 Nov 92 20:38:40
- Lines: 22
-
- >Professor E.R. Swart of the Computer Science Department at the University
- >of Guelph, has recently developed a polynomial-sized linear programing
- >formulation of the graph isomorphism problem and he has been able to show
- >that with minor modifications, this same formulation can be used to solve
- >the Hamilton tour, clique and other subgraph isomorphism problems.
-
- Fortunately or unfortunately, Swart's stuff is like the "proofs"
- of Fermat's last theorem that turn up from time to time. He
- first released his P=NP "proof" in the early 80's and has been
- trying to patch up the mistakes ever since.
-
- Also, nobody has ever proved that graph isomorphism is NP-complete,
- unlike those other problems. There is a clever argument by Goldwasser
- and Sipser from a few years ago that graph isomorphism is probably
- *not* NP-complete. (I don't keep up with this field and don't
- know what's been happening since then.).
-
- It is true that if P=NP then all cryptography everywhere (not just RSA)
- is dead; but at this point I wouldn't take Swart's claims seriously
- without seeing some consensus among complexity efforts that unlike
- his previous attempts, his latest effort is free of bugs.
-
-