home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!palmer
- From: palmer@cco.caltech.edu (David M. Palmer)
- Newsgroups: sci.astro
- Subject: Re: Kepler's Mom Not Burned...
- Date: 17 Nov 1992 22:55:16 GMT
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 20
- Message-ID: <1ebt8kINNbhd@gap.caltech.edu>
- References: <stone.721334960@cwis> <1992Nov16.180901.18089@vdoe386.vak12ed.edu> <bruce.721941117@spssig> <17NOV199211592634@csa3.lbl.gov>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu
-
- sichase@csa3.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE) writes:
- >There is always Keplers "Fourth Law," the one we don't talk about much
- >today. If I remember correctly, he claimed that the semimajor axes of the
- >planetary orbits were in the ratios of the radii of all the inscribed regular
- >polyhedra. This is not exactly numerology, but it's close enough to
- >be considered pretty silly by modern standards.
-
- Instead we use Titus-Bode's law which states that the semi-major axis
- of planet n is 0.4+ 0.3 * 2^n Astronomical units, with small exceptions:
- Mercury is planet n=-infinity and Venus is planet n=0
- The asteroid belt is planet n=3
- Ignore Neptune. Pluto is planet n=7 (which is evidence that
- Neptune is an escaped moon of Pluto :-))
-
- If Kepler's fourth law were correct, then we would talk about it. Titus-Bode's
- law is just as close to numerology, and people talk about it.
- (I use it as a mnemonic.)
-
- --
- David Palmer palmer@alumni.caltech.edu
-