home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!know!mips2!news.bbn.com!olivea!gossip.pyramid.com!pyramid!infmx!subodh
- From: subodh@informix.com (Subodh Nijsure)
- Newsgroups: rec.autos
- Subject: Re: shoud there be two different licences
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.220910.4516@informix.com>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 22:09:10 GMT
- References: <1992Nov12.013141.7090@wam.umd.edu> <1992Nov12.131954.1850@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> <1dttaqINNh69@armory.centerline.com>
- Sender: news@informix.com (Usenet News)
- Organization: Informix Software, Inc.
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1dttaqINNh69@armory.centerline.com> jimf@centerline.com (Jim Frost) writes:
- >rjwade@rainbow.ecn.purdue.edu (Robert J. Wade) writes:
- >>In article <1992Nov12.013141.7090@wam.umd.edu> jailbird@next02wor.wam.umd.edu (serial killer) writes:
- [ ..stuff delted..]
- >
- >Personally I think if you're going to change the licensing system you
- >ought to make it such that you really must be proficient to get the
- >license rather than making lots of little restrictions. Most testing
- >systems are ridiculously easy, both in the written and driving
- >portions.
- >
- >jim frost
- >jimf@centerline.com
- How many people would agree to a driving test every 5 years? DMV places
- a Video Camera in you car and reviews your driving after two days?
- How many people would agree to that?
- -Subodh ( subodh@informix.com or smn@netcom.com )
-