home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.audio
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!news.Brown.EDU!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!jvnc.net!darwin.sura.net!wupost!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!xn.ll.mit.edu!xn!tonyb
- From: tonyb@juliet.ll.mit.edu ( Tony Berke )
- Subject: Re: DCC -- JUST SAY NO! (was: The end of cassettes,
- In-Reply-To: jeh@cmkrnl.com's message of 14 Nov 92 02:52:10 PST
- Message-ID: <TONYB.92Nov16135326@oberon.juliet.ll.mit.edu>
- Sender: usenet@xn.ll.mit.edu
- Organization: M.I.T. Lincoln Lab - Group 43
- References: <BxKt78.2Hu@unix.portal.com> <27408@oasys.dt.navy.mil>
- <1992Nov12.160517.26983@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>
- <1992Nov14.025211.864@cmkrnl.com>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 13:53:26
- Lines: 54
-
- The previous poster insinuated, probably correctly, that the only
- reason DCC was being promoted was that it would lead to increased
- profits for Phillips. I don't doubt it, but I must point out that
- that is the same motivating factor for the release of about 99.99% of
- all products on the market! You can't really blame Phillips for being
- part of a (semi-)capitalist market system, can you? DAT would have
- been my first choice, but the record companies and lawyers screwed it
- all up. To the extent that Phillips may have contributed to that,
- shame on them.
-
- The poster continued on to assert that the analog cassette was good
- enough for its "intended uses" anyway, and that there was no benefit
- to the consumer from getting near-cd-quality audio in the car, etc.
-
- As a semi-pro studio engineer that currently sees his products
- released exclusively on cassette, I couldn't disagree more. I turn
- out great-sounding cassettes, digitally mastered, then duped in realtime
- on Chrome-bias tape with Dolby-B, on good decks. These sound great
- on great home systems, but sound like sh*t on many of my
- unsophisticated customers' car systems, which often lack Dolby and/or
- a Chrome EQ setting. Even when they do, many people don't know what
- they are, and don't set the switches properly. From them, I get
- complaints that my recordings sound "too shrill". Gee, I wonder why?
-
- First of all, many (most) of the analog cassette playing equipment
- that makes its way into low- and mid-fi setups is so terrible that the
- move to digital-quality sound would be a clear advantage. One might
- not always need the signal-to-noise ratio that digital has to offer,
- but the lack of wow and flutter, speed error, etc, is almost always
- audible.
-
-
- My guess is that DCC systems will all sound pretty good, and the
- problems will all show up in the reliability department. In the past,
- it has seemed to me that it is MUCH easier for a big profit-driven
- mass marketer to ignore sound quality than it is for them to ignore
- reliability. Assuming that there is enough consumer demand to keep
- the development effort going, my assumption is that there will
- eventually be a bunch of not-bad sounding cheapo DCC players built
- into car and walkman audio systems. This will be good for lots of
- people (who will enjoy their music more, even if they don't know why),
- not just big record companies.
-
- I don't want to specifically endorse DCC -- I am in no way convinced that
- the tapes or the players will be reliable in the near term. However, the
- world DOES need an easily recordable digital playback system. I'd rather
- it be a cheap full-bitrate CD-compatible system, but if DCC is what it
- takes to get all those boomboxes into a compatible realm of higher-fi,
- I'm all for it.
-
- Tony Berke (A.K.A. President, Full House Audio)
-
-
-
-