home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.kids
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!news.service.uci.edu!ttinews!metis!reid
- From: reid@metis.tti.com (Reid Kneeland)
- Subject: Re: After the Stork Long Underwear
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.154056.21972@ttinews.tti.com>
- Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: metis.tti.com
- Organization: Transaction Technology Inc.
- References: <1992Nov16.190255.9018@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 15:40:56 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Nov16.190255.9018@adobe.com> riggle@adobe.com (Kathleen Riggle) writes:
-
- >My main gripe with flame retardancy garments is that they are usually
- >100% polyester and just don't feel as good as 100% cotton; now I'm at
- >a loss. I don't know if I should dislike these new long john's or
- >not!
-
- I think it's a great boon to parents. If your kid spontaneously
- combusts, you won't have to buy new underwear for the next one.
-
- Just out of curiosity, has anyone on this group ever had a child
- saved from injury by a flame-resistant garment? (Friends of friends
- don't count.)
-
- =====================================================================
- Reid Kneeland
- reid@tti.com (that's MISTER reid@tti.com to you!)
- Transaction Technology Inc., Santa Monica, CA, USA (310) 450-9111 x2499
- The opinions expressed above do not necessarily etc etc...
-
- Never trust a man who can count to 1,023 on his fingers.
-