home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usna!faculty!baldwin
- From: baldwin@csservera.scs.usna.navy.mil (J.D. Baldwin)
- Newsgroups: misc.education
- Subject: Re: Where the extra money goes.
- Message-ID: <BALDWIN.92Nov16163242@csservera.scs.usna.navy.mil>
- Date: 16 Nov 92 20:32:42 GMT
- References: <1992Nov16.103650.320@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@usna.NAVY.MIL
- Organization: Comp. Sci. Dep't., U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD
- Lines: 37
- In-reply-to: solman@athena.mit.edu's message of 16 Nov 92 06:36:50 -0400
-
- In article <1992Nov16.103650.320@athena.mit.edu> solman@athena.mit.edu
- (Jason W Solinsky) writes:
- >In NYC in particular, a large fraction of this money goes to janitors
- >who make $20,000 more than teachers in this school system with some of
- >the highest paid teachers in the country. NYC may be an exception with
- >respect to the janitorial situation, but any district where half of
- >all personell costs go to non-teachers is doing something VERY wrong.
-
- I'm a big detractor of the inflated "support" costs of our educational
- system, but I have to register mild disagreement with this statement.
- "Half of all personnel costs to non-teachers" isn't specific enough to
- address any real problem. I suspect that some substantial portion of
- the people labeled as "janitors" in the source that quoted the above
- factoid are actually what might more accurately be called
- "maintenance" employees, which are and ought to be in a different
- category from "janitors."
-
- Any service industry (like education) that is people-intensive is
- going to have to have quite an /* TRENDY BUZZWORD ALERT */
- infrastructure (buildings, grounds, food service, transport, etc.).
- Maintaining that /* TRENDY BUZZWORD ALERT */ infrastructure is going
- to be a large portion of the cost. A large portion of that portion is
- going to be personnel costs. I agree that non-teacher personnel costs
- are probably, in most jurisdictions, outrageous (it's certainly true
- of the Maryland schools), but I'm not quite as shocked as you are at
- the "figure" of "half of all personnel costs" going to non-teachers.
- When you add the myriad legitimate functions of administrative staff
- to the staff we've already mentioned, a figure of "half" doesn't seem
- to me to be so outrageous. Show me specific numbers broken down into
- more specific categories of school system employees, and I might start
- to work up a sweat over it.
- --
- From the catapult of: |+| "If anyone disagrees with anything I
- _,_ J. D. Baldwin, Comp Sci Dept|+| say, I am quite prepared not only to
- _|70|___:::)=}- U.S. Naval Academy|+| retract it, but also to deny under
- \ / baldwin@usna.navy.mil |+| oath that I ever said it." --T. Lehrer
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-