home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.sysadmin
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!parc!mdixon
- From: mdixon@parc.xerox.com (Mike Dixon)
- Subject: Re: SUMMARY: cpu usage of unused but enabled serial port
- Message-ID: <mdixon.722483881@thelonius>
- Sender: news@parc.xerox.com
- Organization: Xerox PARC
- References: <1992Nov17.142613.27644@news.th-darmstadt.de> <1992Nov18.110002.17869@pilhuhn.ka.sub.org>
- Date: 23 Nov 92 01:58:01 GMT
- Lines: 10
-
- hwr@pilhuhn.ka.sub.org (Heiko W.Rupp) writes:
-
- [ ... ]
-
- you've misunderstood the original posting. the problem isn't that serial
- port communications generate interrupts and consume cpu time when they're
- being used; it's that they generate interrupts and consume *more* cpu time
- when they're not being used (under some circumstances; see my previous
- posting for details).
- .mike.
-