home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usenet
- From: gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu (Garance A. Drosehn)
- Subject: Re: NeXT/Addison-Wesley Documentation Set Update
- Message-ID: <ftv1m2r@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eclipse.its.rpi.edu
- References: <1992Nov15.210912.5530@Happy-Man.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 08:07:25 GMT
- Lines: 90
-
- irving@Happy-Man.com (Irving_Wolfe) writes:
- > gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu (Garance A. Drosehn) writes:
- > >irving@Happy-Man.com (Irving_Wolfe) writes:
- > >> As previously announced in one of the NeXT Usenet newsgroups, we
- > >> are accepting orders for the Addison-Wesley NeXT documentation set
- > >> at a Usenet group purchase discount price.
- >
- > > [details of a very attractive offer skipped over, an offer I'll
- > > probably try to get in on myself...]
- >
- > >I would personally suggest that no one ever send credit card
- > >information via email. It's not that I don't trust Irving or his
- > >company, but I *strongly* suggest that no one should assume that
- > >your email message will not be seen on the way to Irving.
- >
- > Different people are differently connected. Perhaps most of us are
- > either on the Internet (lucky souls!) or, like my site, connected
- > by uucp through reasonably trustworthy direct-Internet sites.
- > I would suggest that for people at
- > sites similarly well-connected, the risk is minimal.
-
- Hmm. The risk is certainly not great, but it's also certainly there (even
- on well-connected, trustworthy sites). I work with mail (at times) here at
- RPI, so maybe I'm more sensitive to the dangers of assuming that email is
- completely secure.
-
- > >Other peoples opinions on this may differ, I'm just suggesting
- > >that people think about it.
- >
- > Thinking about it and discussing it are fine. Running away in fear
- > is fine, too, after having thought about it and after having
- > discussed it. But running away in fear without the analysis is
- > silly. E-mail, as compared with a telephone call, cuts expenses at
- > both ends, allows use at any hour, [...many other good things]
-
- I agree with all the benefits of using email, and certainly I prefer using
- email instead of phone calls for the vast majority of my dealings. The only
- time I prefer phone calls is when giving out credit card information. I
- still don't think it's safe enough to use for information which is that
- sensitive.
-
- > There is a major price paid for lack of trust.
-
- Agreed, there is always a price paid for lack of trust.
-
- There is also a price to pay if you blindly trust mechanisms which are not
- worthy of trust. Depending on the issue, this price can be much higher than
- the price paid for lack of trust.
-
- > One man who ordered
- > the set from us responded to our original posting, when we thought
- > the price would be $204 rather than the actual $224.06. [etc]
-
- This story, while interesting, has no bearing on my point. This is a story
- of someone who did not trust *you* (the company). I trust you, but not the
- mechanism of email (not for particularly sensitive information, at least).
-
- > E-mail is a genuinely trivial risk and a great convenience, though
- > surely, like crossing the street, it is a risk. One major reason for
- > the existence of the Internet is the improvement in accuracy and the
- > savings of time that it brings in cases like this. If not for this
- > use and others like it -- if the Internet were only good for
- > passing around alt.binaries.pictures -- shouldn't it really be shut
- > down?
-
- Alternate rhetorical question: If the Internet is so riskfree and secure,
- then why should NeXT even consider encrypting mail?
-
- Still, I do agree that it's less convenient to use the phone than email, and
- that at *least* 98% of all people who would use email for such orders would
- not have their credit card number end up anywhere that they don't expect it
- to. In my case, that's still too much of a risk for something like credit
- card numbers. It's a perfectly acceptable risk for the majority of
- information I send out, but I (personally) am a bit skittish when it comes
- to things like credit card numbers.
-
- What I'd really prefer is some way to get the credit card number to irving
- (or whoever...) via phone just to set up an account. For all the other
- details (such as ordering specifics and mailing-address) I would like to use
- email for all the reasons Irving listed. I suspect that would be even more
- of a hassle for the company (Irving's) though...
-
- Hmm, would it be a hassle to do it the other way? Email an order with all
- the details except for the credit card number, and then call up with that
- last tidbit?
-
- --
- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.its.rpi.edu
- ITS Systems Programmer (handles NeXT-type mail)
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy NY USA
-