home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.acorn
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!ub4b!news.cs.kuleuven.ac.be!gate!rilke!tytgat
- From: tytgat@rilke.esat.kuleuven.ac.be (John Tytgat)
- Subject: Re: Computer Concepts
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.112704.8970@gate.esat.kuleuven.ac.be>
- Sender: news@gate.esat.kuleuven.ac.be (USENET News System)
- Organization: K.U.Leuven, Belgium
- References: <28130@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 11:27:04 GMT
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <28130@castle.ed.ac.uk> eopa21@festival.ed.ac.uk (R Spooner) writes:
- >All this talk about Computer Concepts' new upgrade policy on Impression
- >is surely only one aspect of the problem. The FaxPack was late, bad, wrong,
-
- Why should a non-ArtWorks owner need Impression v2.18 if this version does
- not provide any extras for him ? Why should CC pay the post&package costs
- (together with the man-hour cost) for a non-ArtWorks owner who doesn't need
- v2.18 if he already has v2.17 ?
-
- Could you be more precise what's so bad and wrong with CC' FaxPack ?
-
- >not as advertised, late, and so on. The Scanlight Professional was OK
- >but there is no after sales support. the support staff are
- >always unhelpful (well, one of them is good), ArtWorks is late and
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
- Euh ? Up to now, my contacts with CC' support staff were very satisfying.
- As far as I know, they do really a good job. Maybe it's just you...
-
- >full of bugs, LaserDirect does not work on RO3.1, and so on.
- ^^^^^^^^^^^^
-
- Really ?
-
- >I think the common factor here is that CC has gone way down hill
- >recently. They used to be really really good, but I have not
- >been impressed with anything since Impression.
-
- Sorry, I can't share your opinion.
-
- John.
- tytgat@esat.kuleuven.ac.be (don't thrust my e-mail address in the header)
- BASS
-