home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sources.d:1435 news.groups:22795 alt.sources.d:1452 news.misc:1891
- Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,news.groups,alt.sources.d,news.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!intell!emcguire
- From: emcguire@intellection.com (Ed McGuire)
- Subject: Re: Should SHAREWARE be posted in comp.sources.misc
- In-Reply-To: randall-joshua@yale.edu's message of 20 Nov 92 19:08:06 GMT
- Message-ID: <EMCGUIRE.92Nov23151409@fuller.intellection.com>
- Sender: emcguire@intellection.com (Ed McGuire)
- Organization: Intellection, Inc.
- References: <1992Nov20.171751.25602@sparky.imd.sterling.com>
- <1ejd2mINN2uv@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:14:09 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1ejd2mINN2uv@MINERVA.CIS.YALE.EDU> randall-joshua@yale.edu (Joshua Randall) writes:
-
- To aid us in our decision, could you inform those who do not read the "sources"
- group what the charter of that group says about appropriate posts?
-
- If you don't read it, why are you concerned about its content?
-
- This is fine, but calling this is CFV is *not* OK! For one thing, I haven't
- seen *any* discussion of this on news.groups, let alone a formal RFD.
-
- It's not a new group proposal, nor was it labeled a Call For Votes.
- It's a referendum by the moderator of an existing group on a question
- internal to the group.
-
- This poll does not violate any Usenet guidelines and I don't
- understand why you are making a big deal out of it. If you want to be
- controversial, try stating an opinion on *.synth. :)
- --
- Ed McGuire 1603 LBJ Freeway, Suite 780
- Systems Administrator/ Dallas, Texas 75234
- Member of Technical Staff 214/620-2100, FAX 214/484-8110
- Intellection, Inc. <ed@intellection.com>
-