home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!ibmchs!auschs!awdprime.austin.ibm.com!ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com!curt
- From: curt@ekhadafi.austin.ibm.com (Curt Finch 903 2F021 curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com 512-838-2806)
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
- Subject: Re: pcnfs and nlm_share
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.134544.16721@awdprime.austin.ibm.com>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 13:45:44 GMT
- References: <1992Nov10.210646.19160@awdprime.austin.ibm.com> <1dr3htINNh8q@seven-up.East.Sun.COM>
- Sender: news@awdprime.austin.ibm.com (USENET News)
- Organization: IBM AWD, Austin
- Lines: 15
-
- (Geoff Arnold @ Sun BOS - R.H. coast near the top) writes:
-
- >A sharing reservation is not a lock.
-
- isn't it just the same as a read lock?
-
- i.e. isn't it just intended to be a prohibition from other processes
- opening the file and writing to it while the dos machin is reading?
-
-
- --
- curt@aixwiz.austin.ibm.com (Curt L. Finch) | AIX NFS/NIS Field Quality
- My views are unrelated to those of IBM | Austin, TX
- Lead_or_Leave's objective is to get all Congressmen to sign a pledge
- that if the Deficit has not halved by their term's end, they'll step down.
-