home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!tilde.csc.ti.com!mksol!mccall
- From: mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539)
- Subject: Re: Problem with Borland's Turbo Debugger for Windows : HELP!
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.210325.29994@mksol.dseg.ti.com>
- Organization: Texas Instruments Inc
- References: <16NOV199223050853@vms1.iscs.nus.sg> <1992Nov16.162408.23622@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <19NOV199201082045@vms1.iscs.nus.sg>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 21:03:25 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In <19NOV199201082045@vms1.iscs.nus.sg> nuscss1@vms1.iscs.nus.sg (Vax BULLET-IN-Board SysOps) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Nov16.162408.23622@mksol.dseg.ti.com>, mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com (fred j mccall 575-3539) writes...
-
- > o rats! more $$$. the guys in the office won't be happy when they
- > hear this... =-)
- >>
- >>Just by the way, where did you get 3 OLD copies of Borland C++ that
- >>you are just now trying to load on machines?
- >>
- > My employer bought them. But then again, these copies
- > were bought a while back when they were coding for Windows 3.0.
- > I guess upgrading the compiler was not high on their priority list...
-
- Well, the upgrade isn't that expensive ($40?) and now you have the
- perfect excuse -- just ask them if being able to DEBUG is high on
- their priority list. :-)
-
- The upgrade is really worth it, particularly if you are using the
- Windows IDE during development. The Windows version of the IDE now
- does all the same kinds of optimizations and such that the DOS version
- did, instead of being a basically 'non-optimizing' compiler.
-
- --
- "Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
- in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me.
-