home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!ckd
- From: ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis)
- Subject: Re: Best choice: pathalias/sendmail or smail?
- In-Reply-To: les@chinet.chi.il.us's message of Sun, 15 Nov 1992 23:42:53 GMT
- Message-ID: <CKD.92Nov15224108@loiosh.eff.org>
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: loiosh.eff.org
- Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation Tech Central
- References: <BxM2FF.EB4@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Nov14.075658.4999@alisa.com>
- <BxqCFr.298@rahul.net> <Bxs77I.Ep1@chinet.chi.il.us>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 03:41:10 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- Leslie> == Leslie Mikesell <les@chinet.chi.il.us>
-
- Leslie> Smail release 3.1.28 adds support for somewhat arbitrary
- Leslie> header-munging with contional string manipulation and database
- Leslie> lookups but I don't know if it handles everything IDA can do.
- Leslie> The configuration files are certainly easier to read, though.
-
- Easier than the .cf, or easier than the .m4 (assuming you use the canned
- Sendmail.mc)? I find the .m4 *really* easy to read, especially given
- that it fits in an 80x24 window...
- --
- Christopher K. Davis | ``Usenet seems to run much like the Kif (or,
- <ckd@eff.org> EFF #14 | for the TV generation, Klingon) high command.
- System Administrator, EFF | Whoever takes action and can be heard wins.''
- +1 617 864 0665 [CKD1] | --Peter da Silva <peter@ferranti.com>
-