home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!mole-end!mat
- From: mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us
- Subject: Re: comp.lang.c++
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.190944.1065@mole-end.matawan.nj.us>
- Summary: Seperate group for design issues?
- Organization: :
- References: <1992Nov13.193122.8662@dorsai.com> <1992Nov20.094137.29839@planet.bt.co.uk>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 19:09:44 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Nov20.094137.29839@planet.bt.co.uk>, njs@planet.bt.co.uk writes:
-
- > |> I Also vote for a hierachy (if someone invents one)
- > |>
- > |> i.e.
- > |> comp. lang. c++. std (discusion on standard (old comp.std.c++)
- > |> . advocay (discusion on new isues)
- > |> . problems (bugs, code, problems)
- > |> . tools (tools ..., porting,)
- > |> . source...
- > |> . don't_know_anmore_idea. bye.bye
-
- > |> ciao vincent@datmuc.dat.de
-
- How about a split between syntax problems and design problems?
- --
- (This man's opinions are his own.)
- From mole-end Mark Terribile
-
- mat@mole-end.matawan.nj.us, Somewhere in Matawan, NJ
-