home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.human-factors
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!jxm
- From: jxm@engin.umich.edu (John Murray)
- Subject: Re: should computers be the sole decision makers
- Message-ID: <s!F=LX+@engin.umich.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 08:47:38 EST
- Organization: University of Michigan Engineering, Ann Arbor
- References: <92320.144804FR5641A@auvm.american.edu> <bergland.14.721900596@edb.uib.no> <Bxsyny.ICq@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: metonymy.engin.umich.edu
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <Bxsyny.ICq@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk> stevem@dcs.glasgow.ac.uk (Steve McGowan (RA)) writes:
- >In article <bergland.14.721900596@edb.uib.no> bergland@edb.uib.no (Magne Bergland) writes:
- >>
- >>The question is wrong! Computers _can't_ be sole decision makers. If
- >>a program "makes a decision" then really the person who designs the program
- >>makes the decision. Thus letting the computer "make the decision" really
- >>means relegating the power of decision to system designers.
- >
- > I think this ties in with an old legal case (which I can't remember
- > the outcome of), which centered along the use of expert systems as
- > information providers/decision support tools.
- >
- > The case, as vague as it is in my mind, concerned a prosecution by
- > a company which took the advice generated from an expert system.
- > Ultimately, it turned out this information was incorrect, and cost
- > the company dearly.
-
- Can anyone shed a bit more light on this case? I'd much appreciate
- a reference to the details of the case. Even an indication of where
- the case was held would be useful, since Steve is posting from Scotland.
-
- Tnx,
-
- John Murray
- Univ. of Michigan
-
-