home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.arch
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!haven.umd.edu!decuac!pa.dec.com!nntpd2.cxo.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!ryn.mro4.dec.com!wrksys.enet.dec.com!bhandarkar
- From: bhandarkar@wrksys.enet.dec.com (Dileep Bhandarkar)
- Subject: Re: DEC Alpha AXP System Performance
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.153756.19870@ryn.mro4.dec.com>
- Sender: news@ryn.mro4.dec.com (USENET News System)
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- References: <1992Nov10.153629.27510@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <BxIM38.L9F.2@cs.cmu.edu> <1992Nov10.212454.6317@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <1992Nov16.131126.785@irfu.se>
- Date: 17 NOV 92 10:34:09
- Lines: 17
-
-
- In article <1992Nov16.131126.785@irfu.se>, bt@irfu.se (Bo Thide') writes...
- >
- >Don't forget that the 735 is both faster and less expensive than the
- >DEC 3000/500 AXP:
- >
- >9000/735: 80 SPECint92, 150.6 SPECfp92 at $35k
- >500AXP: 74.3 SPECint92, 126.0 SPECfp92 at $39k
- >
- to complete your table:
-
- 9000/755 80 SPECint92, 150.6 SPECfp92 at $59k
- 3000/400 AXP 65.3 SPECint92, 112.2 SPECfp92 at $15K
-
- Cost per seat and price/perf are important too. You also have to look at
- configurations, expandability etc. 735 and 3000/400 are desktop. 755 and
- 3000/500 are deskside.
-