home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky co.general:1803 co.politics:2118
- Newsgroups: co.general,co.politics
- Path: sparky!uunet!convex!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!agate!boulder!ucsu!ucsu.Colorado.EDU!fcrary
- From: fcrary@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (Frank Crary)
- Subject: Re: Constitution
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.061951.26830@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ucsu.colorado.edu
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
- References: <1992Nov13.164918.14150@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> <Bxty6L.FLJ@fc.sde.hp.com>
- Distribution: co
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 06:19:51 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <Bxty6L.FLJ@fc.sde.hp.com> marc@hpmonk.fc.hp.com writes:
- >: However, the Supreme Court in Katzenbach v. Morgan ruled that inequal
- >: levels of protection against discrimination don't necessarily violate
- >: the Fourteenth Amendment.
- >For those of us not legal scholars, could you perhaps elaborate?
-
- The law in question was a federal exemption from literacy tests (in
- order to vote) for anyone with a sixth-grade or better education in
- a Puerto Rican, spanish-speeking school. One of the objections
- was that this law denied equal protection to educated, speakers
- of Spanish, simply because they were not educated in Puerto Rico.
- The Court held that there a law did not have to deal with all
- forms of discrimination at once: It was acceptable to offer one
- group protection without offering another group the same protection.
-
- Frank Crary
- CU Boulder
-
-