home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ornl!sunova!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!sol1.lrsm.upenn.edu!kaplan
- From: kaplan@sol1.lrsm.upenn.edu (Peter Kaplan -Yodh)
- Newsgroups: alt.privacy
- Subject: Re: Random phone number harassment
- Message-ID: <98375@netnews.upenn.edu>
- Date: 19 Nov 92 16:48:42 GMT
- References: <phurley.78@tamu.edu> <1992Nov15.131927.12211@bnlux1.bnl.gov> <1992Nov19.150458.11066@qiclab.scn.rain.com>
- Sender: news@netnews.upenn.edu
- Organization: Laboratory for Research on the Structure of Matter, University of Pennsylvania
- Lines: 12
- Nntp-Posting-Host: sol1.lrsm.upenn.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov19.150458.11066@qiclab.scn.rain.com> Leonard.Erickson@f51.n105.z1.fidonet.org writes:
- >
- >Actually, areacode boundaries have *nothing* to do with it. You *will*
- >get caller-ID info on any call from an properly equipped ecxchange
- >as long as the entire route supports SS& (Signalling System 7). It's
- >possible to get it on long distance calls *now*.
- >
-
- So, how do we get longe distance caller-ID blocking from areas with no caller-ID
- such as Pennsylvania ?
-
- --Peter (kaplan@sol1.lrsm.upenn.edu)
-