home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.pagan
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!natinst.com!radian!markbr
- From: markbr%radian@natinst.com (markbr)
- Subject: Re: Guns & self defense
- Sender: usenet@radian.uucp (Usenet login for mail routing)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.223214.15551@radian.uucp>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:32:14 GMT
- Distribution: usa
- References: <1245@abb-sc.abb-sc.COM> <1992Nov22.100927.25874@adobe.com> <JJAS.92Nov22123350@acs.nntp-read.bu.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: zippy.radian.com
- Organization: n.o.y.b
- Lines: 59
-
- In article <JJAS.92Nov22123350@acs.nntp-read.bu.edu> jjas@acs.nntp-read.bu.edu (Jason Stephenson) writes:
- >I will tell you why criminals commit crimes: why murderers murder and why
- >rpists rape> because it is perfectly natural for the human animal to do these
- >things.
-
- Nope. Sorry. You are implying that they are *all* done for the *same* reason,
- which simply isn't true. Is the person who kills, in the course of a robbery,
- the same as someone who says, I don't like this person, I'll figure out how
- I can kill them & not get caught, the same? Suppose the robber was holding up
- a bank, because their family needed medical care, and couldn't afford it? Or
- suppose it was a Muslim in Bosnia, whose people hadn't been able to get food
- in weeks, and he had a chance to get some from the Serb "paramilitary"? In
- that case, is starving someone else "natural"?
-
- >For the 60,000 years that our species has existed we have raped and
- >killed as a matter of course, a matter of survival. Now, in the last one
-
- Sorry again. Rape, as a matter of survival? *EVERY* study *I* ever heard of
- says that rape has nothing, even, to do with sex: it is power over, for
- someone who feels powerless.
-
- >thousand years some philosopher decides that killing is 'bad' and that we must
- >not kill any longer. So, someone is going to tell me that 60,000 years of
-
- The last thousand years? As far as I know, killing, excepting, of course, war
- and judicial murder, has *always* been bad. Check out the code of Hammurabi,
- from, what, 1500-2000 (or was it older) BCE.
-
- >biological programming is 'wrong?' Humans are violent by nature. You cannot
-
- Bullshit. I *personally* *never* been in a real fight in my life, and I grew
- up in a neighborhood that was 95% black, anb rough, by the time I was 10.
- And no, I don't crawl.
-
- >tell me that our ancestors who hunted animals with masses of over ten times
- >that of a Homo sapiens were not ferocious. Remember, all they had for a weapon
- >was a poiinty stick or broken rock. We have changed little in these 60,000
-
- Those animals, they stampeded over cliffs (the preferred method). Remember,
- cattle weigh a lot more than wolves, too.
-
- >years. On the inside, in the deepest part of our brains, we are the same
- >animal. What has changed are our external condidtions of living and our con-
- >scious level of thought. But our desires, our needs, our instincts remain
- >esentially the same. If you want a psychological explanation for rapes and
- >crime and how our unnatural living conditions affect the human brain in an
- >adverse manner read Freud's _Civilisation and its Discontents_. I will tell
-
- What I know about that book, though I have not read it, is that Freud comes
- to the conclusion you do, but is afraid to take the next logical step: that
- society must be changed.
-
- >you this, humans are not, by nature, peaceful. Sixty thousand years of non-
- >evolution prove that we remain ferocious predators. You might also want to
- >read Desmond Morris', _The Naked Ape_.
- >
- > Jason
-
- mark
-