home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!chx400!ira.uka.de!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!west.West.Sun.COM!pongo!markk
- From: markk@pongo.West.Sun.COM (Mark Allen Kampe)
- Newsgroups: alt.magick
- Subject: Re: Women Vs Men
- Message-ID: <1edra0INNi24@west.West.Sun.COM>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 16:34:07 GMT
- References: <Bxx21I.Mnz@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Reply-To: markk@pongo.West.Sun.COM
- Organization: Sun Microsystems
- Lines: 18
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pongo.west.sun.com
-
- >Hmmmmm....the optimum role.... The optimum role for the typical
- >exploitative, self-serving, egotistic medieval woman would
- >be to have piles of wealth and (somehow) lots of influence so the
- >church and politics would leave her alone. Regarding the
- >breeding aspect, she'd select a group of stud-males to service
- >her, and nannies to take care of the babies. Whether or not a
- >female could have actually managed to do this is doubtful.
-
- Eleanor of Aquitaine comes to mind.
-
- >Realistically, the best a female could do would be to marry
- >someone rich and make the best of it.
-
- Sadly, she couldn't find anyone richer than herself to mary, so
- she was forced to marry down ... to the king of England.
-
- However I do not for a moment offer this to refute any of the
- rest of Ms Brown's observations and comments.
-