home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu!krobinso
- From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
- Subject: Re: After much thought,
- Message-ID: <By6wJD.499@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu
- Organization: Penn State Computer Science
- References: <kmr4.298.722472494@po.CWRU.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:16:24 GMT
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <kmr4.298.722472494@po.CWRU.edu> kmr4@po.CWRU.edu (Keith M. Ryan) writes:
- >
- > I have concluded that K e n is correct. K e n is K e n. K e n can
- >not be smart, as K e n is K e n. If K e n was smart, K e n would not be
- >K e n. Thank you for enlightening us, oh great K e n.
-
- You are making unwarranted extrapolations. K e n is intelligent, for
- K e n is K e n.
-
- K e n R o b i n s o n
-