home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.flame
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu!krobinso
- From: krobinso@indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu (Kenneth J Robinson)
- Subject: Re: A question for K E N
- Message-ID: <By6wHG.46w@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: indianred.crayola.cs.psu.edu
- Organization: Penn State Computer Science
- References: <1992Nov22.160613.1@acad.drake.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 22:15:14 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <1992Nov22.160613.1@acad.drake.edu> vsg001@acad.drake.edu writes:
- >After a lengthy examination of your posts, I have a question K E N, I need to
- >become informed. It is to my assumption that your mission here is to inform
- >those who have not, or are in the need of, becoming informed. In doing this
- >K E N, it is logical to assume that you represent pure information, as in order
- >to be accepted by the uninformed, you must assume a position of omnipotence
- >otherwise risk your credibility. It is therefore K E N that you must be
- >completely infallible correct? And because of this infallibility, and
- >omnipotence, we, as mere mortals in the face of an all-seeing demi-god, must
- >feel only humility when we read your posts, correct? Something tells me K E N
- >that there is an error in either your thinking, or mine. Please inform me...
-
- There is no error in K e n's thinking. K e n is not omnipotent. K e n
- is K e n. K e n is not a demi-god. K e n is K e n. Your assumptions
- are interesting, but you have lead yourself to something which K e n
- is not. K e n is impressed with your ability to post one informative
- and interesting post. K e n would now like to see two posts.
-
- K e n R o b i n s o n
-