NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/alt/flame/14979

Internet Message Format | 1992-11-20 | 3.9 KB

Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!dsbc!kev
From: [e-mail] (Kevin Walsh)
Newsgroups: alt.flame
Subject: Christ on a flagpole, athiests suck!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 20 Nov 92 10:47:18 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Organization: Cursor Software Limited, London, England
Lines: 74

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Father Ryan) writes:
>
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Kevin Walsh) writes:
> >
> >Ok, so what if GB goes on national TV today and states that all atheists
> >are fuckers and should be shit on sight, what are you going to do about
> >it?  fire him.
>
>     "shit on sight"? Very humorous imagry. I can imagine Mr. Bush
> telling his pilot of Air Force One to fly over all the athiests on the
> streets below, sticking his ass out the door and shitting. Oh, wait a
> minute, he has done so already. It was called the election campaign.
>
It's good to see that you can still spot speellin mistakes at 100 feet.

>
> >Everybody has a right to their own opinion.  If he really wanted to collect
> >all the passports from athiests and throw them out of the country, he had
> >a good few years to get it done.  Why do you think he didn't do it?
>
>     One, everyone has the right to their own opinion. However, there are
> inappropriate times to express certain opinions. Would it be appropriate for
> the president to start showing doubt if Jews really ought not to be rounded
> up and exterminated? What if he said, "I don't know if Jews ought not to be
> herded like cattle, casterated, and then set to the gas chambers. After all,
> out nation does need lampshades. I don't know if they are citizens, nor if
> they ought to be treated as human beings." Notice, he never said that he
> felt that it ought to be done. However, his public show of doubt about the
> humanity of the Jews, and their right for constitutional protection would be
> damaging to the Jews. Mr. Bush's remarks have caused harm amoung the athiest
> community, from individual anguish to giving legitamacy to bashing athiesm.
>
Bungee jumping Christ on a bridge, you can't expect the President to lie ALL
of the time, he has to have a break every once in a while.  As to your
reference to Hitler there, if Hitler had got up in Germany before he got into
power and made just those remarks, he probably wouldn't have got into power.
My point is that if people make their position on certain issues clear, the
voters can decide if those people are arsewipes or not.

In this case, he didn't get voted in and some other draft-dodging bastard
got to take over for a stint in office.

>
>     As for you next lines, it is non sequitar. Most US citizens do not
> have a passport. If you are not leaving the nation ( except for Canada, the
> Bahamas, etc ), you don't ever need one. My FL driver's liscence is a valid
> enough for of ID, thank you. So, why would he try to take away all these
> passports?
>
Well, same here but you get the idea.

>
>     The main reason of why he hasn't attempted to throw them out, is
> that he recognizes that he has no legitimate authority to do so. However,
> his support of peer-forcing athiests to pray in public schools, HAVE been
> damaging to the athiest community. Thank god, the SC has struck any
> attempts down!
>
> >>PS: I'm happy to find that nobody has flamed my .sig (yet).>
>
>     Too obvious.
>
That's good.  Hardly any KR reference there at all I thought.

Another point to get you wound up into an even greater frenzy.  Your
constitution, I beleive, calls for religious equality, what religion do
athiests have? and what makes them think that they deserve equality
under the US constitution?

--
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/    _/  _/_/_/  _/    _/
  _/_/_/   _/_/      _/    _/    _/    _/_/  _/     K e v i n  W a l s h
 _/ _/    _/          _/ _/     _/    _/  _/_/      [e-mail]
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/      _/    _/_/_/  _/    _/