home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsstand.cit.cornell.edu!vax5.cit.cornell.edu!ewn
- From: ewn@vax5.cit.cornell.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.divination
- Subject: Re: New Topic: Reading for/about yourself...
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.182313.16088@vax5.cit.cornell.edu>
- Date: 21 Nov 92 18:23:13 EST
- References: <#+mq!cq@lynx.unm.edu>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Cornell University
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <#+mq!cq@lynx.unm.edu>,
- blowfish@carina.unm.edu (rON.) writes:
- >
- > Greetings!
- > Just wanted to kick up some discussion around here. :)
- > Couple of questions-
- > 1) How accurate do you find readings that you do for yourself? Do you have
- > a particular deck that you use for yourself and not for others? Do you have
- > any problems reading for yourself ever?
- >
-
- My readings for myself have not until recently been very accurate at all.
- They hit the right subject, certainly, but they basically told me exactly what
- I wanted to hear. That's the major problem with reading for yourself; emotions
- get in the way of intuition.
-
- I've gotten a bit better since I started using the Oswald Wirth deck for
- personal readings. No symbolic meanings for the lesser arcana (pretty pip
- cards, basically) but the major arcana are much more personally significant.
- Still somewhat emotion tinged so I dont do it too often, but also significantly
- more accurate.
-
-
- > 2) Have you ever done a reading for somebody else (especially a 'romance' based
- > reading) that had yourself in it?
- >
- > r.
-
- Nope. In fact I've never done a reading for a romantic partner- they've never
- really wanted one, when I've had a partner at all.
-
- MB
-
-