home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / alt / callahan / 13902 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-19  |  1.3 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!news.claremont.edu!nntp-server.caltech.edu!SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU!LYDICK
  2. From: lydick@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU (Speaker-to-Minerals)
  3. Newsgroups: alt.callahans
  4. Subject: Re: The Nightstalker speaks out
  5. Date: 20 Nov 1992 04:30:44 GMT
  6. Organization: HST Wide Field/Planetary Camera
  7. Lines: 14
  8. Distribution: world
  9. Message-ID: <1ehplkINNduj@gap.caltech.edu>
  10. References: <1992Nov20.002004.9546@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
  11. Reply-To: lydick@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU
  12. NNTP-Posting-Host: sol1.gps.caltech.edu
  13.  
  14. In article <1992Nov20.002004.9546@ucc.su.OZ.AU>, pope@physics.su.OZ.AU (The Nightstalker) writes:
  15. >I don't dislike you, but the Stm I know is just a wall of hate, that is all I
  16. >see.
  17.  
  18. >I don't read your posts so I wont be inflamed or hurt by what you say.  I
  19. >only saw bits of what you had said in others posts.
  20.  
  21. Right.  I don't suppose it's occured to you that the bits you've seen are, of
  22. course, the most controversial?  And that they don't include the context?  One
  23. of the unstated rules of the net is that you don't include more text than is
  24. necessary to remind someone who's been reading the thread of the context.  That
  25. means if you're reading only the stuff that ends up being included in
  26. responses, you're getting a VERY biased idea of my side of the thread.  Is that
  27. how they teach physicists to evaluate evidence in Oz?
  28.