home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!maryb
- Newsgroups: alt.callahans
- From: maryb@cix.compulink.co.uk (Mary Branscombe)
- Subject: Re: Economics and the Environment
- Reply-To: maryb@cix.compulink.co.uk
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 1992 17:51:00 +0000
- Message-ID: <memo.749946@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Sender: usenet@gate.demon.co.uk
- Lines: 22
-
- In-Reply-To: <1992Nov10.125618.25522@bmerh85.bnr.ca> sjane@bmers248.bnr.ca (sj-
- s)
-
- Safe, hygenic, sealed packaging is one thing. Two layers of plastic
- and two layers of cardboard with a plastic wrapper around the outside
- as well is just plain silly. Most of the "excess" packaging is for
- advertising and marketing, not for hygiene. You really don't need a
- bag inside a box inside a bag, do you? Use rigid plastic instead of
- the box and the inner plastic to cut out a layer - but gosh, doesn't
- the logo look weedy when it's not printed in proper four colours on
- card?
- They still wrap fatty food in the wrong kind of cling-wrap over here.
- Hygiene?
-
- mary
- apprentice potter
- +-------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
- | pending repairs..... |maryb@cix.compulink.co.uk |
- | | |
- | under new management! |maryb@cix.compulink.uucp |
- +-------------------------------------------+--------------------------+
-
-