home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.bbs
- Path: sparky!uunet!gator!larry
- From: larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
- Subject: Re: TBBS versus RA/Netware
- Message-ID: <Bxxnq9.Buz@gator.rn.com>
- Organization: The Gator Conferencing System 219-289-3745
- References: <1992Nov11.134133.24287@uvm.edu> <721643537snx@sound.demon.co.uk> <1992Nov17.184131.60943@cc.usu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 22:27:45 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- sl9dm@cc.usu.edu writes:
-
- >YOu have RA running fine with 2 lines, just add another DIR, another CONFIG.RA
- >and any changed .RA/.BBS files to that directory. Bruce Bodger (RemoteAccess
- >Help for the USA) runs like 5 or 6 lines on his 1 machine (2 numbers. 1 for
- >9600+ callers and the other for 3/12/24 callers)
-
- With no DV? RA has the multitasker included?
-
- >Sorta, but for one thing, TBBS is *NOT* Desqview capible. This I hear from my
- >old boss, who hear from AUTHOR! for Another, TBBS has a limit of 64
- >message/file areas I belive the count is. and cann't go above 62,000 messages
- >TOTAL. IMHO It's best to stick with RA!
-
- TBBS Is very limited indeed. It also doesn't support external (non eSoft)
- (ie: typical DOS programs) applications. It doesn't support a real time
- usenet interface as well.
-
- --
- Larry Snyder internet: larry@gator.rn.com
- keeper of the Gator uucp: uunet!gator!larry
-