- McJobs and Workers -
Re: The hypocrisy of anti-McDonald stance...
Posted by: Jennifer ( Norway ) on April 24, 1997 at 20:50:42:
In Reply to: The hypocrisy of anti-McDonald stance... posted by Ryan Butterfoss on April 23, 1997 at 20:27:49:
: When it comes to "protecting the worker" I think the anti-McDonald's groups are very self-serving and hypocritical in their views. They are using cases of worker mistreatment, anti-union policies, etc. to advance their stance on the environment, meat consumption, and cultural exportation (and in some extreme cases, anti-capatilism). The thing I'm wondering is, who serves the McDonald's worker better...the owners who provide them with a job and steady pay check, or the groups that are trying to get them fired? How can you dare speak in defense of workers whose company you want to shut down? My two cents.How would you treat the workers if you were the boss?
The cases about the mistreatment and treatment of workers unfair is true.
Do you mean just because the employer provide the employee salary its fair for him to treath him the way he want? They pay for the employees services. The unions guide the employees in a lot of matters, like how much salary they have the right to and how many hours a day they can work and
if they have the right to be paid when they are working overtime.
Follow Ups:
|