home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- In article <4oibgb$7ms@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, schow@bnr.ca says...
- >
- >cross-posted to executor group.
- >
- >In article <Pine.Sola.3.91.960529143205.11705A-100000@ux5.cso.uiuc.edu>,
- >sintes anthony rene <sintes@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:
- >>
- >>I would take it a step further and say that IBM should make a mac-os/2
- >>much like win-os/2. I've seen a couple nice mac emulators so it can be done.
- >>If they did this, I know a few people who would invest heavily in OS/2.
- >
- >Oh, yes. Please. With HPFS for long file names.
- >
- >Think of all the companies that are fighting the Mac vs Win95 wars!
- >Many Mac shops will convert to OS/2.
- >
- >License Executor (or ARDI should work with IBM to make an add-on) and
- >allow "seamless Mac-OS/2" launching. IBM already has a license to
- >MacOS, so it could even run the finder.
- >
- >Way cool.
- >
- >Let me see, I will should be able to run an OS/2 native Netscape,
- >a seamless Windows Netscape, a seamless Mac Netscape, a seamless
- >X Netscape (off an Unix host); and of course WebEx; yep, that will
- >do me fine.
- >
- >
- >I know, I am babbling, but the concept is so exciting!
- >
- >--
- >Stanley Chow; schow@bnr.ca, stanley.chow-ott@nt.com; (613) 763-2831
- >Bell Northern Research Ltd., PO Box 3511 Station C, Ottawa, Ontario
- >Me? Represent other people? Don't make them laugh so hard.
-
- If they did add it, I know I'd swich my main OS from win to os/2!
- --
- _-_-Nate_-_-
-
-
-